Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dj many
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
AfDs for this article:
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 02:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Dj many (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
does not meet notability criteria, relies on primary sources, page is an orphan Myrtlegroggins (talk) 09:41, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 09:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and the magazine articles aren't really from "major" news sources. Sarah (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I notified the author of the page about the possible deletion. The author replied on the user talk page and suggested Djmany has notability because of his presence at Twitter.Myrtlegroggins (talk) 10:01, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Many & Dj Many. (not sure how force no redirect)Dru of Id (talk) 01:28, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Having a presence on Twitter and YouTube does not demonstrate notability. At all. Anyone can upload a video of almost anything, or gain a "following" on Twitter. If a video of this guy goes viral enough to be mentioned in notable secondary sources (i.e. a magazine review), then this page may have a chance for survival. InedibleHulk (talk) 02:37, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.